immigration

Serrano in the Strike Zone

Congressman Jose E. Serrano played some Big League politics over the last week.

Serrano lead off with speed – as does any decent batting order – running the Wildlife Conservation Society’s 5k Run at the Bronx Zoo.  The event helped raise money for endangered species.

Next up on his agenda, during hearings on financial regulation Serrano, who chairs the Appropriations subcommittee on financial services, repeated his opinion on Wall Street whining.  Some leaders, like New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, think that heavy regulation will make firms leave, and cost the city untold tax revenue.  Serrano said that financial firms were an important part of New York City, but that their concerns should not trump those of everyday citizens – like his South Bronx constituents.

“There will always be a need for Wall Street, wherever Wall Street may be situated,” he said. “But this is where they want to be, and what they bring to New York should not be the excuse we use to let them get away with what they did before.”

On deck for the Congressman in the three-hole was a house bill that would allow Puerto Ricans to reevaluate their status vís a vís the United States.  Serrano, who was born in Puerto Rico himself, authored the bill.

The bill would ask Puerto Ricans if they are happy with the status quo, and if not, allow them to vote on statehood, independence, “free association” or staying the way things are. But his longtime teammate, Rep. Nydia Velasquez, broke with him on this bill, saying it was designed to push Puerto Ricans to vote for statehood. But Serrano claims no preference and says that the current status, as a territory –which he says is a euphemism for a colony – is the only one he doesn’t like.

“Today’s vote was a strong display on the part of the U.S. Congress that we would like to hear the opinions of the Puerto Rican people on status, while laying out a process that does not favor one option or another,” said Serrano after the bill passed on Thursday.

And batting cleanup was his effort to fight the recent Arizona immigration law.  Passed last week, the law would require immigrants in the state to carry documents on them at all times – or be subject to arrest.  Serrano is among many leaders who believe the law will lead to profiling.  After all, what does an immigrant look like?  How will a police officer know of someone – oh, let’s say a Latino – who says they are not an immigrant and do not have such papers is lying?

“Whether a player is foreign born, or just of an ethnicity that could be targeted by this unconstitutional law, everyone should be scared of a law that empowers law enforcement to arrest people based on looks,” he said.

Serrano pitched the idea of moving the 2011 Major League Baseball All Star Game out of Arizona in a letter to MLB commissioner Bud Selig.  Serrano said that the league should pay attention to the matter, because 27% of its players are foreign born.

“MLB has a very loud megaphone,” said Serrano, “and their rejection of Arizona’s action would be an important demonstration to Arizona that we do not tolerate such displays of intolerance in our nation.

The idea is not without precedent either.  In the 1990s, the National Football League rescinded an agreement to hold the Superbowl in Phoenix, following protests from players upset that the state still would not recognize Martin Luther King ‘s birthday as a holiday.

Serrano – who’s 16th Congressional District includes Yankee Stadium – is not new to mixing baseball and politics.  In 2005, at the hearings on steroid use in baseball, Serrano addressed the speakers – which included Sammy Sosa, and the estranged “bash brothers” Mark McGuire and Jose Canseco:

“For me, baseball is not a game. It’s a passion,” he said.  “Without this game, this country is in deep trouble.”

Little Poland Gets Smaller

In a small coffee shop near Manhattan Avenue in Brooklyn, 33 year-old Junusz serves coffee and greets costumers in English and Polish. Mostly in Polish.

His coffee shop, like dozens of restaurants, groceries and bookstores along the Williamsburg-Greenpoint border, has been decorated since last Sunday with red-and-white flags and a black strip. Next to signs indicating “We speak polish” there are more signals of mourning for the Polish President and the 95 dead who were killed in a plane crash a week ago.

More than 150,00 Poles bade farewell to the Polish President Lech Kaczynski and his wife Maria today, as they were buried in Krakow. In Greenpoint, dozens of Polish-Americans gathered in the Polish and Slavic Center on Kent street to pay their final respects.

Earlier this week Nydia Velazquez followed President Obama and Mayor Bloomberg in offering condolences to Brooklyn’s Polish community.

“Our nation enjoys deep ties to Poland. Communities across our country have been shaped and built by millions of Polish immigrants who came to the United States seeking a better life. These immigrants – and their descendants – have added invaluable contributions to the rich tapestry of American culture,” Velazquez stated.

Greenpoint received a lot of attention this week.  Local and national news used the neighborhood as the domestic angle on the “Poland Crash” story, shedding light on the large community.

But the large population of working-class Polish immigrants – the second largest concentration in the United States after Chicago – rarely makes headlines.

“Greenpoint, Brooklyn, in my district, has one of the most vibrant Polish-American communities in the nation. During the 1980s, many Poles took refuge in this ‘Little Poland’ when martial law was imposed against Solidarity, back home,” Velazquez said in a letter of condolence.

The Poles did take over Greenpoint in the 1980s, but the vibrant community has been shrinking in the last five years.

The 2000 census registered nearly 40 thousand people in the 11222 zip code of Greenpoint. Of them, 43.6 percent claimed Polish ancestry. Hispanic or Latino were 19.5 percent of the neighborhood. The 2010 census will likely show a different picture when the count is completed.

Thirty years after their big immigration influx, it’s not as easy to get a visa to the US, and since 2004, when Poland joined the European Union, many Poles opt to travel shorter distances and make more money in the United Kingdom.  For those in Greenpoint, without a legal status, going back home becomes a popular option.

“The golden age for Poles in America is over,” said Junusz. “We make less money now, and I can’t even get a driver’s license here.” He said, “If things don’t work out soon, I will probably go back home.”

Economic problems, rising real estate prices and an exodus back to Europe of those who had no legal status here contributed to the decline in numbers.

Velazquez, Chair of the Hispanic Caucus in Washington and representative to one of the largest immigrant populations in the US, has  long been a vocal advocate for immigration rights.  Reaching out to the Poles in her district during a national tragedy is protocol, but are the Polish immigrants in her district on her agenda on less tragic days?

Not enough according to Junusz.

He won the green-card lottery 8 years ago, but his Polish lawyer in New York never managed to get him legal status. Nor did the Polish consulate assist him. Asked what he wants from Velasquez, he said, “Give us our status.”

Velazquez Joins the Anti-Rahm Emanuel Choir

Obama’s Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel is the man everyone loves to hate recently – or once again. He’s being blamed for either being too pushy (and naked), or not pushy enough.

With a health care reform to pass, Emanuel has received growing attention for various reasons; mostly unsympathetic.

Immigrant and minority groups, who played a role in getting Obama into the White House, feel that their interests have been pushed back. Emanuel, possibly the closest man to the President, could have acted as the catalyst or the roadblock. It all depends on what his most pressing issue is.

And all other issues, inevitably, have to wait.

This week, Nydia Velázquez, Chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, expressed her concerns regarding “The Limits of Rahmism”.

“There are strong feelings about Rahm Emanuel among members of the Hispanic caucus,” Velázquez told The New York Times Magazine.

“People feel Rahm Emanuel has not been helpful in moving forward. He’s always about the numbers. He’s always about being the pragmatist. He’s always about winning,” Velázquez stated in the 8,000-word Emanuel profile. (A profile Emanuel himself didn’t take a part in.)

No legalization, no reconciliation

Velázquez and Hispanic lawmakers blame Emanuel for barring illegal immigrants from buying policies on new insurance exchanges in the Senate health care bill.

His caution on easing rules for immigrants, The Wall Street Journal wrote, derive from fearing such a position will hurt Democrats at the polls.

Immigrant rights groups slammed Obama for slow action with the bill legalizing the status of undocumented immigrants, and health care for illegal immigrant, but is the former Illinois Senator the (only) one to blame?

Frienemies

But Velázquez and Emanuel couldn’t have been in greater harmony over the years – at least throughout their shared time in Congress, between 2003-2007. They voted together 95.65 percent of the time, (23 out of 22 votes).

In 1114 floor votes, they disagreed only 97 times. And only one of those 97 instances was an immigration related bill (Border Security — Diversity Visa Program, HR4437).

Even with her BFF Nancy Pelosi, Velázquez voted the same way only 87.5 percent of all floor votes. On immigration issues, however, they voted together.

But even since he’s been in office, Emanuel hasn’t always been an immigration antagonist. Last year, he got credit for clearing the path for increased benefits for immigrant children and pregnant women in the State Children’s Health Insurance Program. It was Obama’s first major legislative victory.

As a religious pragmatist, Emanuel’s stance on immigration, may be, like Velázquez unintentionally suggested this week, the winning one. Focused on the health care bill, some say winning passage of an amnesty bill for the undocumented immigrants is unlikely.

Velázquez could be rightfully mad with Emanuel, and so may other minority interest groups, but right now, they all need to take a number. He’s set on finding a majority.

Crowley Leads Way for Immigration Reform

In a recent article by the National Journal, Joseph Crowley was named as one of five up-and-coming House Democrats. “They form a second tier of leaders-in-training who could be in line to take over when their top party chiefs either retire or are forced out,” according to the article.

The article also called Crowley the go-to person for immigration reform. Back in September, Crowley, along with 111 House Democrats, wrote a letter to President Obama asking to reform immigration. Obama gave a speech last year on June 25 asking for reform, but the issue hasn’t moved much since then.

The letter detailed elements of reform. Undocumented immigrants would register, go through background checks, pay taxes, study English in order to apply for legal status, and then eventually apply for citizenship. As chairman of the New Democrat Coalition – a pro-business, moderate group – Crowley proposes that taxing immigrants could be be way to generate revenue for the state and provide benefits for those contributing to the workforce.

More than 60 percent of Crowley’s district speaks a language other than English at home, and 40 percent of the population are foreign-born, according to the Almanac on American Politics. So, Crowley should have constituent support for immigration reform.

But his interest in immigration may also stem from a personal connection – his mother. She emigrated from Northern Ireland as a child, according to whorunsgov.com. Given that Crowley has sought leadership roles throughout his career, it seems likely he will run for a more prominent office in the future. So, he must think that reform should add political points in New York.