Puerto Rico

Serrano in the Strike Zone

Congressman Jose E. Serrano played some Big League politics over the last week.

Serrano lead off with speed – as does any decent batting order – running the Wildlife Conservation Society’s 5k Run at the Bronx Zoo.  The event helped raise money for endangered species.

Next up on his agenda, during hearings on financial regulation Serrano, who chairs the Appropriations subcommittee on financial services, repeated his opinion on Wall Street whining.  Some leaders, like New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, think that heavy regulation will make firms leave, and cost the city untold tax revenue.  Serrano said that financial firms were an important part of New York City, but that their concerns should not trump those of everyday citizens – like his South Bronx constituents.

“There will always be a need for Wall Street, wherever Wall Street may be situated,” he said. “But this is where they want to be, and what they bring to New York should not be the excuse we use to let them get away with what they did before.”

On deck for the Congressman in the three-hole was a house bill that would allow Puerto Ricans to reevaluate their status vís a vís the United States.  Serrano, who was born in Puerto Rico himself, authored the bill.

The bill would ask Puerto Ricans if they are happy with the status quo, and if not, allow them to vote on statehood, independence, “free association” or staying the way things are. But his longtime teammate, Rep. Nydia Velasquez, broke with him on this bill, saying it was designed to push Puerto Ricans to vote for statehood. But Serrano claims no preference and says that the current status, as a territory –which he says is a euphemism for a colony – is the only one he doesn’t like.

“Today’s vote was a strong display on the part of the U.S. Congress that we would like to hear the opinions of the Puerto Rican people on status, while laying out a process that does not favor one option or another,” said Serrano after the bill passed on Thursday.

And batting cleanup was his effort to fight the recent Arizona immigration law.  Passed last week, the law would require immigrants in the state to carry documents on them at all times – or be subject to arrest.  Serrano is among many leaders who believe the law will lead to profiling.  After all, what does an immigrant look like?  How will a police officer know of someone – oh, let’s say a Latino – who says they are not an immigrant and do not have such papers is lying?

“Whether a player is foreign born, or just of an ethnicity that could be targeted by this unconstitutional law, everyone should be scared of a law that empowers law enforcement to arrest people based on looks,” he said.

Serrano pitched the idea of moving the 2011 Major League Baseball All Star Game out of Arizona in a letter to MLB commissioner Bud Selig.  Serrano said that the league should pay attention to the matter, because 27% of its players are foreign born.

“MLB has a very loud megaphone,” said Serrano, “and their rejection of Arizona’s action would be an important demonstration to Arizona that we do not tolerate such displays of intolerance in our nation.

The idea is not without precedent either.  In the 1990s, the National Football League rescinded an agreement to hold the Superbowl in Phoenix, following protests from players upset that the state still would not recognize Martin Luther King ‘s birthday as a holiday.

Serrano – who’s 16th Congressional District includes Yankee Stadium – is not new to mixing baseball and politics.  In 2005, at the hearings on steroid use in baseball, Serrano addressed the speakers – which included Sammy Sosa, and the estranged “bash brothers” Mark McGuire and Jose Canseco:

“For me, baseball is not a game. It’s a passion,” he said.  “Without this game, this country is in deep trouble.”

Nydia and Jose – The End?

A Puerto Rican partisan partnership has come to an end Thursday in Washington.

They were both born on the Island, came to New York, became Democrat Representatives of the Hispanic community, and almost everything they voted on, they voted (94 percent) together. Until H.R. 2499 came and changed everything.

Jose E. Serrano won a small victory last week, when the “Puerto Rican Democracy Act” he supported passed 223-169 and turned the two against each other.

It’s not that Nydia Velazquez is against the idea of Puerto Rico democratically voting to change the current status, but she doesn’t believe that this is what Serrano’s bill is about.

H.R. 2499 offers Puerto Rico, (a U.S. territory for 112 years), a two-step vote. The first would ask whether Puerto Ricans are happy with the current commonwealth status or if they want change.

If they vote for change, a second vote would ask what change they want:

(a) Statehood (b) independence (c) an independent sovereignty.

Serrano succeeded where Velazquez failed three years ago.

The “Puerto Rico Self-Determination Act of 2007” (H.R.1230) a bill Velazquez sponsored in the 110th Congress, favored a Puerto Rican constitutional convention, allowing Puerto Ricans to decide if, how and when to make this change. But it didn’t get past Congress.

The new bill, however, is not what she had in mind. Velazquez called bill 2499 a “disgrace,” “shameful” and “appalling” bill. She rejected it as a biased proposal with a predetermined outcome in mind, directed to create a majority for the Statehood option.

“It does place members in the awkward position explaining why they are meddling in Puerto Rico when a request from Puerto Rico has not even been made… this legislation is designed to push the statehood agenda, regardless of whether that agenda is the best solution for the Island, or even popular among the people,” Velazquez said.

After a long debate, Velazquez was able to restore a fourth option in the second round: A status quo.

Velazquez argued that if keeping the current status was no longer on the ballot, statehood – always the second choice in the past – would win by default.

Serrano and Velazquez are both, naturally, interested in democracy and the best interests of the people of Puerto Rico, but have different ways in expressing their love. It seems like a complex issue with subtle, unclear differences.

If only there was someone who could simplify this issue in a black-and-white- dichotomous, repetitive language.

Well… there is someone who comes to mind, and he’s just as outraged about the passage of the “Puerto Rican Democracy Act” as Velazquez is.

“Congressmen, voting for HR 2499 are like sheep being led to slaughter,” Fox news’ Glenn Back wrote in his blog.

“You’ll hear it ‘democratically elected’ to refer to leaders like Hitler, Chavez and Castro — all democratically elected.”

Is it possible that Velazquez will recover from the betrayal of the mustached Bronxnite with a bipartisan re-bound?

Both Beck and Velazquez pointed out (separately, obviously) the fact that this kind of a bill, a statehood option, had failed three times in the past.

With piercing blue eyes and a cheeky smile, best-selling books and unintimidated by criticism or facts, who cares if they agree for completely different reasons?

“That’s what’s happening,” Beck wrote, “The fundamental transformation of America. And this is only the beginning.”

And like the best friend’s role in every break-up, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi declined to support the bill.