Afghanistan

Serrano's Wars

The NYOFCo plant on the shore of the East River.
The NYOFCo plant on the shore of the East River.

This week, Jose E. Serrano declared victory in a long-and-hard fought war just days after declaring that another war was a lost cause.

Serrano supported Dennis Kucinich’s resolution for withdrawal from the nine year-old war in Afghanistan in the House on Wednesday.  The resolution failed in a 356 to 65 vote.

By Friday, Serrano declared victory in a 18 year-old battle against an odorous fertilizer plant in the South Bronx.

On Wednesday, the Department of Environmental Protection announced that it would terminate its contract with The New York Organic Fertilizer Company (NYOFCo).

NYOFCo started operating on the Hunts Point waterfront in 1992.  Sewage from throughout the city is brought on barges to the plant, where human refuse is turned into fertilizer pellets. Recycling our worst bits of waste into products that can be sold and used to grow crops seems like a great program. But locals think the whole operation stinks.

The red-and-white-striped smokestack of the plant looms over the southern part of the neighborhood as if a giant Cat in the Hat had left behind his signature headwear. At one of the neighborhood’s few green spaces, the new Baretto Point Park, children play in the shadow of the plant.  But it’s been more than an eyesore.  The plant emits a noxious odor, that one resident described as smelling like “old garbage, burned rubber and pestilence” to The Hunts Point Express. The smells have driven residents indoors, leaving the park empty on days when the wind doesn’t blow odors away.  People have repeatedly reported getting sick from the smells.

Community groups rallied together to fight the plant for years, and Serrano has been a big supporter of their cause, speaking against renewing the plant’s permits. Resident’s sued NYOFCo in 2008, and in 2009 the state also sued the company.  Until now the biggest victories were a state smell inspector and promises of tougher regulations on the odors.

The long hard fight has produced positive outcomes beyond the goal of shutting the plant down, according to Serrano.

“The remarkable thing about the years-long fight against NYOFCo is that it became the tool that our community used to organize itself,” said Serrano in a press release Friday. “The coalitions that formed in this campaign have gone on to fight on behalf of other pressing environmental causes – of which there are far too many in our borough – and have won many of those fights.”

Serrano wrapped up his remarks with more language of a triumphant warrior: “I look forward to more victories like this one, but today’s is particularly sweet.”

So Serrano knows that a long arduous fight can be won, and is worth the wait.  Yet, his remarks on Afghanistan make it seem like he has lost his faith in the fighting spirit.

“Nine years later, I believe that Congress has the duty to reevaluate America’s involvement in a war that seems to have bogged down with very few signs of success,” said Serrano when he addressed the House floor Wednesday.

“We seem unable to eradicate the Taliban enemy—they scatter before our troops into lawless regions, and then return once our troops leave,” he continued. “This is a costly war without an end in sight.”

Serrano initially supported the war, but says that the goals have changed, and that victory is not in sight.

But what if he had adopted the same attitude halfway through the fight against the foul smelling plant?  The persistence of Serrano and residents made the South Bronx a better place for children to grow up.  Similar persistence may or may not eventually make Afghanistan a better place for children to grow up as well – and thus make the entire world safer.

The measure was certain to fail, and any Congressman’s decision to support it was clearly more political than practical. However Serrano and residents of his embattled district, should know not to give up when the going gets tough.

A Busy Week for a Congressional Progressive

Nadler speaking at the Center for American Progress on March 10
Nadler speaking at the Center for American Progress on March 10

Congressman Nadler had a busy past week, packed full of victories and defeats for the progressive representative.

First, the victories. A U.S. District Court judge in New York this week filed a permanent injuction against legislation called the Defund ACORN Act, which passed both chambers in September of last year. At the time, Nadler and others criticized the bill, saying it violated the Constitution’s protection against “bills of attainder“.

Judge Nina Gershon of the Easter District of New York agreed. Conservative bloggers and commentators are crying foul, accusing Judge Gershon, a Clinton appointee, of (wait for it…) “judicial activism.”

Congessman Nadler, who chairs he House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, applauded the decision, saying in a press release released March 12:

As I said on the House floor in September, when the bill of attainder was introduced, Congress must not be in the business of punishing organizations or people without due process.  The Republican amendment was flatly unconstitutional, and we ignore the Constitution at our own peril.  Constitutional principles are there to protect all of our liberties and cannot be compromised – certainly not for political witch hunts.

As has been noted elsewhere, some saw the broad language used in the Defund ACORN Act as an attempt to get around being a bill of attainder, while inadvertently lumping in all groups or companies who have broken the law as being ineligible to do business with the U.S. government. Given the potential ramifications of this, it remains to be seen who will come to the act’s rescue.

Now for the defeats. A bill calling for the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan was defeated in the House, 356-65. Nadler was at least in good company, as 75 percent of the New York City delegation voted in favor of withdrawal, with the notable exceptions of Congessmen Engel, Weiner, McMahon and Meeks, who all voted “no”.

And lastly Congressman Nadler continued his push for gay rights, this time in the area of housing discrimination. Nadler has been at the forefront of LGBT legislative issues. This week he and Congressman John Conyers of Michigan, who chairs the House Juiciary Committee Nadler sits on, introduced a bill that would amend the Fair Housing Act of 1968 to “prohibit housing discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity”, according to Nadler. He continued:

Outright discrimination, steering, a refusal to build accessible housing as required by law, and discriminatory lending practices continue to plague renters and prospective homeowners.  And, shamefully, discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity are perfectly legal in many areas, and people are regularly denied a place to live simply because of that status.

All in a week’s work for one of congress’s most progressive members.